Re: Bug#62352: usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 10:55:59PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Yes, because it was a major Policy change, and Lintian demands conformance
> > to the latest policy. Hopefully we'll have Policy 3.x compliance a reason
> > to file RC bugs against woody packages, so that will get fixed sooner.
> However, we should expect that a package would either completely
> implement policy pre-3.0 (ie /usr/doc), or 3.0 (/usr/share/doc
> with /usr/doc symlink), and not some combination. I would like to see
> packages missing /usr/doc (either way) be fixed. It is very annoying.
Of course. A package must follow one Policy version at a time, not
several. I'd say that warrants an upload in frozen.
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification