On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 03:58:55PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > What's your point? Neither is release critical.
> What can I say but: I disagree.
You could offer an objective, non-circular rationale for what bugs should
be considered release-critical or not. You could provide an argument as to
why it's better not to provide these packages at all, than to offer them
in their existing semi-broken state.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred.
``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it
results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgpDKd4FVdtFN.pgp
Description: PGP signature