On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 03:58:55PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:21:14AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > What's your point? Neither is release critical. > What can I say but: I disagree. You could offer an objective, non-circular rationale for what bugs should be considered release-critical or not. You could provide an argument as to why it's better not to provide these packages at all, than to offer them in their existing semi-broken state. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred. ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.'' -- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgpDKd4FVdtFN.pgp
Description: PGP signature