On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:16:34PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Current situation: People are forced to make local workawounds like symlinks
> in /usr/local/bin or PATH modifications that violate the
> FHS. We have evidence on this thread that numerous people
> are making these types of workarounds.
Note that `violating the FHS' isn't really such a ghastly horrible thing.
> Proposed solution: Adding 5 or 10 symlinks *automatically*,
Exactly which `5 or 10' symlinks would these be?
I think, if anything, we should be doing this on a case-by-case basis,
personally, rather than arguing about generalities.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred.
``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it
results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgp0hUhoP3cKH.pgp
Description: PGP signature