Re: /etc/profile should include sbin in PATH
>>>>> "Remco" == Remco van de Meent <email@example.com> writes:
Remco> ``Deciding what things go into "sbin" directories is
Remco> simple: If a normal (not a system administrator) user will
Remco> ever run it directly, then it should be placed in one of
Remco> the "bin" directories. Ordinary users should not have to
Remco> place any of the sbin directories in their path.''
Then I think our problem is that we are violating this part of
the FHS. For example, the following utilities are regularly
run by users:
There are undoubtedly more examples, but I know traceroute is The
Biggy. It's a major tool that users run all the time, and there's no
reason for it to be in /usr/sbin. Should we file bugs, even though FHS
compliance is not a release goal?
Brought to you by the letters B and O and the number 10.
"Elate means having wings."
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer of Gimp and GTK+ -- http://www.debian.org/