Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 220.127.116.11a-2) ?
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 07:20:27PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> But just to err on the side of caution, would anyone doing what Santiago is
> doing PLEASE recompile their packages against the latest versions of the
> potato libraries shortly before the potato freeze?
> Mixed slink/potato systems are temporary things. Potato will be around for
> a long time. So let us please make it internally consistent.
Programs compiled against slink xlib6g libraries won't run correctly
when run with potato xlib6g libraries installed?
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name