[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= ?

On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 11:43:14AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Should I rebuild the i386 binaries with the new xlib6g-dev
> > and upload them with .0.1 version number suffix?  Or perhaps it
> > doesn't matter?
> As far as xlib6g is concerned, I don't think it does matter.

But it might.  There *have* been changes to the libraries between
and 3.3.5.  No, I don't think any interfaces have changed.

But just to err on the side of caution, would anyone doing what Santiago is
doing PLEASE recompile their packages against the latest versions of the
potato libraries shortly before the potato freeze?

Mixed slink/potato systems are temporary things.  Potato will be around for
a long time.  So let us please make it internally consistent.

G. Branden Robinson              |     One man's theology is another man's
Debian GNU/Linux                 |     belly laugh.
branden@ecn.purdue.edu           |     -- Robert Heinlein
cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpo_J_xGTwf1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: