Re: ProFTPd being lame

To: Robert Stone <talby@trap.mtview.ca.us>
Cc: Chris Rutter <chris@fluff.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame
From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 00:29:10 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990919002910.B23005@usatoday.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990918162133.B13139@ticking.accesscom.com>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.9909171144130.461-100000@inkvine.fluff.org> <[🔎] 19990918162133.B13139@ticking.accesscom.com>

On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:21:34PM -0700, Robert Stone wrote:
>  Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
> stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual
> anon ftp sites as provided besides proftpd.

roxen does.

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ProFTPd being lame
  - From: "Martin Bialasinski" <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de>
- Re: ProFTPd being lame
  - From: David Bristel <targon@targonia.com>

References:
- Re: ProFTPd being lame
  - From: Chris Rutter <chris@fluff.org>
- Re: ProFTPd being lame
  - From: Robert Stone <talby@trap.mtview.ca.us>

Prev by Date: Re: Hosed system during package build
Next by Date: Re: A few changes
Previous by thread: Re: ProFTPd being lame
Next by thread: Re: ProFTPd being lame
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread