Re: ProFTPd being lame
You are correct. Of course, many people forget about this since they think of
Roxen as a web server, and ftp being a secondary feature. Of course, with all
the Apache fanatics out there, many have never even checked out Roxen.
Dave Bristel
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 00:29:10 -0400
> From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>
> To: Robert Stone <talby@trap.mtview.ca.us>
> Cc: Chris Rutter <chris@fluff.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame
> Resent-Date: 19 Sep 1999 04:29:14 -0000
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:21:34PM -0700, Robert Stone wrote:
> > Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
> > stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual
> > anon ftp sites as provided besides proftpd.
>
> roxen does.
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: