[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Suggestion: Skip Slink!

Avery Pennarun wrote:
> However, if slink/sparc is released with a few changes after slink/i386,
> there's nothing stopping the i386 people from rebuilding their packages with
> sparc's changes in order to catch up.  We just call that Debian 2.1r2, and
> sparc never made a 2.1r1 release.  If I'm an admin concerned with
> consistency, I stayed with hamm until all my required arches were stable.

I agree (came up with the same idea independantly, in fact).

see shy jo

Reply to: