Re: Suggestion: Skip Slink!
John Goerzen wrote:
> > However, if slink/sparc is released with a few changes after slink/i386,
> > there's nothing stopping the i386 people from rebuilding their packages with
> > sparc's changes in order to catch up. We just call that Debian 2.1r2, and
> > sparc never made a 2.1r1 release. If I'm an admin concerned with
> > consistency, I stayed with hamm until all my required arches were stable.
> This logic only works if you happen to use FTP.
When debian 2.1r1 is released, new source and binary cd's would be made.
see shy jo