Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
Navindra Umanee writes:
> And too bad for a bunch of other OpenSource-licensed code.
Why put it that way? Why not "too bad for a bunch of GPL-licensed code"?
Why is the GPL at fault when people choose to publish under a license
incompatible with it? I don't criticize you for putting your code out
under the NPL (or whatever): why criticize me for using the GPL?
email@example.com (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill