Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Sun, Aug 30, 1998 at 11:25:24AM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> Jeff Noxon <email@example.com> writes:
> > Unfortunately we're still fairly backward here. Corporate E-mail
> > goes through an X.400 gateway that won't pass large messages or
> > attachments. Gotta love those mainframes.
> Couldn't you just subscribe to the "securtiy package update" mailing
> list forwarded on an external machine that uses a tool to break up
> (and encode (uuencode or whatever)) the packages, and then have that
> machine mail them to an internal machine that watches the subject
> lines and reassembles them (like uudeview)?
Leave it to a large company to come up with policies that make any kind
of sane solution difficult. :)