Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> > I don't like this proposal. This implies that if you want even
> > one package that depends on fhs, you end up moving stuff
> > indiscriminately into the new locations.
>
> I suppose another option is to upgrade support programs only for slink
> (making it a slink requirement that any program with a reference to
> /usr/man also supports /usr/share/man in the same fashion, and similarly
> for info, and doc (dwww)).
Exactly! This is what I would like to see. See my previous mail, which I
posted before reading this one (this morning I had 132 messages in my
debian-devel folder :-).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNb7pAiqK7IlOjMLFAQGAVAP/cIzZMxvdGzB9i7dPk8VMe9DfwYlp6bqc
erJVR2rxsAaEdGnYifuP7e27Vj/JOU/i94MONyPRBQjHc8vvHvjr49ZLAxGxgtzO
GXknLhSxKdhl8tFeVY02VdeV9Ix3D2bK4a8WhMz3GVMTOl2pLjUaDkHmh4PMsuUk
UPkX7Y5KL7M=
=Srtr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: