Re: LSB and package formats
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I didn't really think before that it did, however after a bit of
> reading the openprojects mailing list archives and thread on this
> subject, I've changed my mind. If LSB is going to be a standard, then
> it needs a standard package file format. Note I say file format, not
> package manager.
File formats imply a purpose. If it's a package file format, then that
implies some things about the package database. So either LSB is going
to have to standardize on not having a package database or it's going
to have to standardize on some specific package database format.
Then again, we can't even get simple bugs fixed in dpkg...
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: