Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
>>"Joseph" == Joseph Carter <email@example.com> writes:
Joseph> The KDE people have implicitly granted the right to use Qt
Joseph> again and again. They have not expressly written it, but
Joseph> there's enough evidence that they have granted the right
Joseph> implicitly to satisfy the question in my mind.
But not in mine. How have they managed to convey this
information to you, without actually writintg it down? Do you know
the developers personally?
Additionally, if they are so darned willing to grant this
exception, how come they are not willing to put this in writing? My
mother warned me about people pushing a product, making promises,
which they would not put in writing. I think she had a point.
"Cable is not a luxury, since many areas have poor TV reception." The
mayor of Tucson, Arizona, 1989 [apparently, good TV reception is a
basic necessity -- at least in Tucson -kl]
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org