Re: kde/gpl discussion is silly
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> aj> if you say "the licence allows me to ..." and the author sais "no,
> aj> it does not", then there might be a problem. but this is not the
> aj> case.
> Actually, I say that the GPL allows me to change anything that
> is part of the sources, which indeed includes a subset of QT, so I
> say I have a right to modify a subset of QT. This is not a problem,
> you think?
This is a point that I don't understand. Qt is not part of the KDE
source. Qt comes with different packages. Qt has a different license.
So why shouldn't I realize/recognize this?
Let's call it an accidental feature. --Larry Wall
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org