[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?



On Sat, Jul 18, 1998 at 10:40:02AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>  Joseph> The KDE people have implicitly granted the right to use Qt
>  Joseph> again and again.  They have not expressly written it, but
>  Joseph> there's enough evidence that they have granted the right
>  Joseph> implicitly to satisfy the question in my mind.
> 
> 	But not in mine. How have they managed to convey this
>  information to you, without actually writintg it down? Do you know
>  the developers personally?

Would a copy of an email saying something along the lines of "Of course we
allow KDE to be linked with Qt!" solve it?


> 	Additionally, if they are so darned willing to grant this
>  exception, how come they are not willing to put this in writing? My
>  mother warned me about people pushing a product, making promises,
>  which they would not put in writing. I think she had a point.

They have, informally, many times by now.

Attachment: pgp_l0Dey9XKv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: