Re: Kernel Recompile
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> And this is what I am questioning. Why is kernel-package
> required? It does nothing special (which is the reason you can't find
> documentions -- it does nothing out of the ordinary at all).
I didn't really say it was required -- I was leaving that to other people.
I'm perfectly happy if our packages clearly document how to set up the
/lib/modules/ (etc.) stuff that's required for them to interoperate with
our systems (or if they clearly refer to documentation elsewhere).
> Loadable modules work just fine with a kernel built the traditional
> way. Think about it. (The whole world, even the whole Linux world, is
> not Debian, thank god).
Hm.... [read, read, test, test] oops, I was wrong. I thought there was
a problem there, but it's clearly not.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: