Re: virtual package for apache required?
remco@Cal011205.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer) writes:
> On Fri, 15 May 1998, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > I propose the following:
> > apache and apache-ssl should both depend on the apache-common and
> > provide apache-virtual (or else) and the other packages (as php) could
> > then depend on it.
> Do these "other packages" currently depend on "apache"? Then inventing a
> new name for the virtual package would be a real pain. But there is no
> need. Just let apache-ssl provide "apache" and let both apache and
> apache-ssl depend on apache-common.
This is, what I did, but at the moment apache-common has file
conflicts with apache until the maintainer of apache changes his
package. But he is not reacting.
Christoph Martin, Uni-Mainz, Germany
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org