Re: virtual package for apache required?
On Fri, 15 May 1998, Christoph Martin wrote:
> I propose the following:
>
> apache and apache-ssl should both depend on the apache-common and
> provide apache-virtual (or else) and the other packages (as php) could
> then depend on it.
Do these "other packages" currently depend on "apache"? Then inventing a
new name for the virtual package would be a real pain. But there is no
need. Just let apache-ssl provide "apache" and let both apache and
apache-ssl depend on apache-common.
Remco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: