Re: virtual package for apache required?
On 24 May 1998, Christoph Martin wrote:
> remco@Cal011205.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer) writes:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 15 May 1998, Christoph Martin wrote:
> >
> > > I propose the following:
> > >
> > > apache and apache-ssl should both depend on the apache-common and
> > > provide apache-virtual (or else) and the other packages (as php) could
> > > then depend on it.
> >
> > Do these "other packages" currently depend on "apache"? Then inventing a
> > new name for the virtual package would be a real pain. But there is no
> > need. Just let apache-ssl provide "apache" and let both apache and
> > apache-ssl depend on apache-common.
> >
>
> This is, what I did, but at the moment apache-common has file
> conflicts with apache until the maintainer of apache changes his
> package. But he is not reacting.
*grin*
Johnie is a busy chap. He's reacting all right. I have talked to him
about this (in the context of of mod_perl) and he is certainly working on
it.
Don't expect anything for hamm, though. But in slink, you can expect a
separate mod_perl package as well (assuming the mod_perl people get there
act together and make it possible for me to compile a completely distinct
library).
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: