Rev. Joseph Carter wrote: > Nah, leafnode does NOT deal with spam well (read: at all). slrnpull is > better at that. Probably why it should be split out of the slrn package. Hmm, interesting idea. I'm willing to do this if there's any demand -- see shy jo, slrn maintainer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org