On Sat, Apr 11, 1998 at 09:10:21PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote: > > From a logical point of view, I think project/experimental is the best > > choice. Why don't we include selected directories from there on the official > > CD (I think of gettext (ouch, don't beat me), 2.1.x software, ...)? > > Project/experimental is not part of hamm. > > If Extra really isn't enough of a distinction (how much more of a > distinction (I still don't see why, given the definition), maybe > there should be a hamm/experimental. I really think that's a good idea.
Attachment:
pgpiyzl_SNi69.pgp
Description: PGP signature