Re: Debian Bug#20445 disagree
On Thu, Apr 09, 1998 at 01:09:39PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Brian White <email@example.com> wrote:
> > The subject in question is whether to include these packages in "stable".
> > "unstable" will include them for sure.
> I think they are appropriate for "stable" provided they are classifed
> as "Extra". That is what the "Extra" priority is for, after all.
I happen to agree. And we also need a 2.1.x Kernel package.
Brian, here in Germany, every Megabyte you have to download is costing real
money. A lot of money. Please put as much on the CD as possible. Declare it
extra, put it in an unstable dir, put warnings all over the place, but
please include it.
We already exclude non-free comlpetely for good reasons, no question. But
why should we exclude free software, even if it is not production ready.
I understand your concern, you want a stable Debian main Distribution. But
for special hardware, you need some components. Those you can find in Extra.
Some of these components could be a Kernel 2.1.x snapshot.
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com