Re: Planning new virtual packages for hamm
Brian White writes:
> > > libcom_err and libuuid will always be a problem though, since they're used
> > > specifically by fsck, which has to be essential.
> >
> > Sorry to respond to my own message, but maybe we should consider making fsck
> > statically linked and put it in its own separate essential package.
>
> I can see statically linking "fsck" being a good idea but I don't think it
> would have to go into its own package.
I guess I can do that without much problems.
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@a2points.com> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
alt-email: <dirson@univ-mlv.fr> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: