Re: Confusion about pristine original sources
Guy Maor <email@example.com> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I don't think that the dpkg scripts have been modified yet to
> > accept the proposed source schemes. [...]
> It exists in versions 220.127.116.11 and higher:
> Klee - is this not widely known?
I'm not sure. I announced it at the time, but as I recall we were in
the middle of some sort of heated debate, so it may have gotten lost
in the noise.
It does work, though --- I'm using it in several of my packages now
without any problems.
A new version of dpkg-source that supports multiple signed upstream
sources and signed patch files is also in the works, but will probably
be 6--8 weeks before it is ready for release (it works now, but needs
a lot more cleaning up and a lot more work on the certificate
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .