Re: new approach: Documentation Policy
Brian White writes:
> > > The original design only called for prefixes because it
> > > also allowed replacements -- changing the prefix so someone could do
> > > something like move all man pages from /usr/man to /usr/share/man.
> > >
> > > Such replacements is much more difficult to implement when you can have
> > > wildcards anywhere in the path.
> > What about using a sed-like mechanism (I mean, in s/.../.../
> > commands) allowing rules as "/usr/doc/examples/\1 ->
> > /usr/doc/\(.*\)/examples".
> It's possible, but probably not worth it. It has to be simple enough
> for anyone to use and regexp is not for beginners.
OK. So let's maybe provide the two possibilities.
BTW, Debian is not a Micro$oft product, which would just not implement
a feature because it's far too difficult to use for beginners! I don't
say that we should neglect newbies; it will be easy here to build a
frontend translating shell-like wildcards into regexp, and allowing
advanced users to directly use regexps !
> > BTW allowing such rules to be set up at any time after package
> > installation would provide a mechanism to "locally fix" packages using
> > an old version of the policy, without systematically re-downloading
> > them (in case just the layout has changed).
> That's possible, but can also be accomplished with "rm <whatever>" or
> "mv <whatever>" in almost all cases.
Sorry, 'rm' is out-of-subject here, and 'mv' is so bad for system
administration that debian provides the "diversion" system to replace
However 'dpkg-divert' might be overloaded of we use it for such a
thing, unless it can divert directories, which I'm not sure...
Yann Dirson <email@example.com>
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .