Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3
Quoting Kai Henningsen (kai@khms.westfalen.de):
> Oh, I give in. There really is no excuse.
There is.
2.0.30 has some problems, undoubtedly. I don't know if they're all fixed with
2.0.30-6 (it works perfectly fine here) but a usual 2.0.30 is poison...
Do you acively 'use' these features? Do you know the drawbacks and
implications?
Though I can understand your point of view and also think the kernel is
stable enough, I think those cautios are right in just being cautios.
$.02
Alexander
--
Das Fleisch ist willig, doch der Koch ist zu schwach.
Alexander Koch - <>< - aka efraim - +49-(0)89-64289385
Gruenwalder Strasse 70 - D-81547 Muenchen - Germany - Europe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: