[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3

Quoting Kai Henningsen (kai@khms.westfalen.de):
> Oh, I give in. There really is no excuse.

There is.

2.0.30 has some problems, undoubtedly. I don't know if they're all fixed with
2.0.30-6 (it works perfectly fine here) but a usual 2.0.30 is poison...

Do you acively 'use' these features? Do you know the drawbacks and

Though I can understand your point of view and also think the kernel is
stable enough, I think those cautios are right in just being cautios.



Das Fleisch ist willig, doch der Koch ist zu schwach.
Alexander Koch - <>< - aka efraim - +49-(0)89-64289385
Gruenwalder Strasse 70 - D-81547 Muenchen - Germany - Europe

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: