Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3
Quoting Kai Henningsen (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> Oh, I give in. There really is no excuse.
2.0.30 has some problems, undoubtedly. I don't know if they're all fixed with
2.0.30-6 (it works perfectly fine here) but a usual 2.0.30 is poison...
Do you acively 'use' these features? Do you know the drawbacks and
Though I can understand your point of view and also think the kernel is
stable enough, I think those cautios are right in just being cautios.
Das Fleisch ist willig, doch der Koch ist zu schwach.
Alexander Koch - <>< - aka efraim - +49-(0)89-64289385
Gruenwalder Strasse 70 - D-81547 Muenchen - Germany - Europe
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .