Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3

[Scott Barker <scott@mostlylinux.ab.ca>]

Alexander Koch said:
> 2.0.30 has some problems, undoubtedly. I don't know if they're all fixed with
> 2.0.30-6 (it works perfectly fine here) but a usual 2.0.30 is poison...

I've been following this discussion for a while now, and would like someone to
explain what's wrong with 2.0.30. I've been using it as a network server, an
internet gateway, and a masquerading box (3 different boxes) and have yet to
have any problems at all.


-- 
Scott Barker
Linux Consultant
scott@mostlylinux.ab.ca
http://www.mostlylinux.ab.ca/scott/   (under construction)

[ I try to reply to all e-mail within 3 days. If you don't   ]
[ get a response by then, I probably didn't get your e-mail. ]
[ Unsolicited commercial and junk e-mail will be proof-read for US$100 ]

"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."
   - ???


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .