Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3
firstname.lastname@example.org (Alexander Koch) wrote on 24.05.97 in <email@example.com>:
> Quoting Kai Henningsen (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > Oh, I give in. There really is no excuse.
> There is.
> 2.0.30 has some problems, undoubtedly. I don't know if they're all fixed
> with 2.0.30-6 (it works perfectly fine here) but a usual 2.0.30 is poison...
Note that I did _not_ say "ship anything except 2.0.30".
If we want to ship another version, that version should include the (well,
a) SYN patch. And the PING patch, incidentally.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .