Re: netscape should be under non-free

["Brian C. White" <bcwhite@verisim.com>]

> I suspect that every package in the non-free tree includes a Debian
> part which is free, yet the package remains in non-free.

I'm sure they do, but that's not the point.  The netscape "package"
includes _nothing_ that is non-free.  Everything in it is, in fact,
in the public domain.

Moving it to non-free would mean it did not get distributed on some
or all of the CD-ROM distributions and I see no reason to limit it in
this way.  I would be willing to move it to "contrib", but I still prefer
it where it is.

                                        Brian
                               ( bcwhite@verisim.com )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In theory, theory and practice are the same.  In practice, they're not.