[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DM-upload-allowed header for prboom (was Re: DM-upload-allowed)

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:10:12AM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:44:54AM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > I expect to request that some of the doom packages have
> > the field added, but I have to get my DM application in
> > first :-)
> Does anyone in the team object to the adding of
> DM-Upload-Allowed field to prboom's control file?

I think it would be good to mention the uploaders this is about.  I
think it's mostly the DD(s) who sponsored uploads of those people who
can say if it's a good idea.

Of course in this case, it's clear that it's about you.  Since I have
not seen any packaging from you, I have no opinion about it (and no


I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: