On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 08:48, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > On Fre, 2003-01-24 at 15:06, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > > > That, in my opinion, is the best way of eliminating the problem of > > private mails getting sent to the list and vice versa: you let the user > > decide to reply to the sender or the list, and the mailer knows enough > > to do both. > > But there are people who like to receive private /and/ public responses > to list mailings Fine. Then use your mailer's 'reply to all' command. > and there are people who only want answers (or > private, of course, if the matter is not for the list - that's still the > senders choice). As Reply-To: is broken - it indicates that the From: > address should not be used at all - how would you convey this > information to the receiver of a list posting? In another email, I suggested another header to accomplish this, explicitly requesting that list replies be CC'd to the sender. Something like: X-CC-On-List-Replies: <user@example.com> How's that sound? Alex. -- PGP Public Key: http://aoi.dyndns.org/~alex/pgp-public-key -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s:++ a18 C++(++++)>$ UL+++(++++) P--- L+++>++++ E---- W+(+++) N- o-- K+ w--- !O M(+) V-- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP+(+++) t* 5-- X-- R tv b- DI D+++ G e h! !r y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part