On Fre, 2003-01-24 at 15:06, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > That, in my opinion, is the best way of eliminating the problem of > private mails getting sent to the list and vice versa: you let the user > decide to reply to the sender or the list, and the mailer knows enough > to do both. But there are people who like to receive private /and/ public responses to list mailings, and there are people who only want answers (or private, of course, if the matter is not for the list - that's still the senders choice). As Reply-To: is broken - it indicates that the From: address should not be used at all - how would you convey this information to the receiver of a list posting? No, I don't like qmail either if that makes you any happier. cheers -- vbi -- be vewwy vewwy qwuiet .. I'm huntin wuntime ewwos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part