Bug#727708: Call for votes on init system resolution

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Nikolaus Rath writes ("Bug#727708: Call for votes on init system resolution"):
> It is not at all clear to me why the CTTE so desperately wants to
> automatically defer to a GR in their resolution. If there is consensus
> to defer to a GR with simple majority among the CTTE, surely it would be
> easy enough to revoke or change the resolution if/when a GR has actually
> happened?

Firstly, it is much easier to get consensus on this in the TC now
while the question of in which direction such a GR might want to
override the TC is far from clear.  Doing it now avoids the danger of
backsliding.

Secondly, I think it's undesirable to have any period of time during
which a GR's decision would not have de jure authority.

Thanks,
Ian.