Bug#727708: Call for votes on init system resolution
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> So let me expand on that a little. Image the following options
> - A: something that doesn't overrule the ctte (1:1)
> - B: something that does overrule the ctte (2:1)
> - FD
In this case, I don't know A could be anything but 2:1, baring riders
from the CTTE. If A is technical, it needs the power of the CTTE under
§4.1.4 which requires 2:1. [I suppose something could be written which
would fall under the DPL's remit.]
As I understand it, we'd like to make everything be 1:1, and the method
we're trying is to write a proposal in such a way that it automatically
enshrouds a non-technical statement by the project in the power of the
CTTE.
It may be that we can't actually do that, and should instead just have
an agreement between CTTE members to enact a decision which followed a
position statement GR under §4.1.5.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
Maybe I did steal your heart
and I am such a perfect criminal
that you never noticed
-- a softer world #481
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=481
Reply to: