Bug#727708: Call for votes on init system resolution
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:09:25PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#727708: Call for votes on init system resolution"):
> > I'm not sure I like the way this is worded, I would have prefered
> > that you asked me about this before calling for votes.
> So assuming that the current vote is cancelled due to 4 people ranking
> FD first: would you care to say what the wording should be ? I don't
> think any of us care very much about this wording and we all agree
> about the intent, so it shouldn't be controversial.
My biggest concern is that you can only do this if the result of
the GR is FD. It should be more explicit that if the option is
trying to override the ctte but failed to reach the 2:1 majority
requirement you will re-evaluate the results with the 2:1 majority
requiremented to override the ctte changed to 1:1 and adopt the
outcome of that (which might still be FD).