Re: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system

To: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
Cc: debian-common-lisp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system
From: Kambiz Darabi <darabi@m-creations.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:30:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87wnfcxn5a.fsf_-_@kd-tux.m-creations.int>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] b24dacd107209592adc632c92b9d11a40ab675ff.camel@debian.org> ("Sébastien Villemot"'s message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2022 13:31:09 +0200")
References: <1899404362.21695.1648753948015.JavaMail.zimbra@m-creations.net> <[🔎] f8fa4dbf5f607141dbf7bcb099c62f9421dd127f.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 1069004127.21049.1649141286577.JavaMail.zimbra@m-creations.net> <[🔎] 136029494.21811.1649149783542.JavaMail.zimbra@m-creations.net> <[🔎] 83965f074d22c833d52878d9350798ce1ffd44e7.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 1196776043.23525.1649193193780.JavaMail.zimbra@m-creations.net> <[🔎] b24dacd107209592adc632c92b9d11a40ab675ff.camel@debian.org>

Hello,

On 2022-04-06 13:31 +02, Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> wrote:

> Your i386 change looks reasonable to me, and it should not break
> anything.

I cleaned up my changes and pushed them to Salsa master. The CI pipeline
is sucesssful:

https://salsa.debian.org/common-lisp-team/sbcl/-/pipelines/371612

I would appreciate if someone could sponsor the release. Please note
that Sébastien removed the debian/2%2.2.3-1 tag which failed
autopkgtest.

Thank you

Kambiz

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system
  - From: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>

References:
- Re: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system
  - From: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
- Re: sbcl autopkgtest failure - missing sbcl.h (was: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system)
  - From: Kambiz Darabi <darabi@m-creations.net>
- Re: sbcl autopkgtest failure - missing sbcl.h (was: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system)
  - From: Kambiz Darabi <darabi@m-creations.net>
- Re: sbcl autopkgtest failure - missing sbcl.h (was: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system)
  - From: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
- Re: sbcl autopkgtest failure - missing sbcl.h (was: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system)
  - From: Kambiz Darabi <darabi@m-creations.net>
- Re: sbcl autopkgtest failure - missing sbcl.h (was: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system)
  - From: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Wiki pages
Next by Date: Re: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system
Previous by thread: Re: sbcl autopkgtest failure - missing sbcl.h (was: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system)
Next by thread: Re: RFS: sbcl/2:2.2.3-1 [NMU] -- Common Lisp compiler and development system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread