Le mardi 05 avril 2022 à 11:09 +0200, Kambiz Darabi a écrit : > > Do we have the possibility of installing the sbcl-source package > > which was built during the previous pipeline build stage? > > Sorry for the noise, re-reading the docs, I found 'Depends' in > debian/tests/control and together with the C_INCLUDE_PATH > patch, autopkgtest is fixed: > > https://salsa.debian.org/darabi-guest/sbcl/-/pipelines/365673 Great! > Now for the broken i386 build: make-config.sh relies on the > result of uname -m to determine the architecture and indeed, > the i386 build container reports x86_64: > > https://salsa.debian.org/darabi-guest/sbcl/-/jobs/2640765#L1327 > > And setting SBCL_ARCH explicitly in debian/rules as it is done > already for ppc64 leads to further problems: > > https://salsa.debian.org/darabi-guest/sbcl/-/jobs/2641145#L1579 > > Any hint how to continue? I would not change the i386 sbcl build for now. It has always worked fine on Debian build daemons, which is what truly matters. I think I would first contact the maintainers of the Salsa CI runners to understand why “uname -m” reports x86_64 instead of i686 in the i386 chroots. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part