Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> (29/04/2013): > I applied and pushed your patch. The maint point is that PO files > get updated by the daily l10n-sync script. > > Then, I propose we upload 1.86 immediately to unstable so that it's > tested at least by those people who install unstable with D-I. > > Cyril, others, do you think there would be a risk that it interacts > badly with the release preparation? The point is not trying to get > 1.86 in testing before the release, of course...bt just have the > patch to receive more testing. While I haven't reviewed the patch yet, having the l10n bits in sync was a point I had in mind this very morning, so I'm glad you did that. And indeed, some feedback ASAP would be nice. I'll try to look into this patch in a few hours at most. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature