Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:48:30AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It is scheduled for release during may, which may or not be delayed a
> > bit. This is way this is an important point to get feedaback from the
> > release team and from the gtk-gnome team now. I am CCing them on this.
> As you are not the d-i or g-i release manager and currently not even on
> the d-i team, it is _not_ your place to do this.
Whyever not ? Frans, you are backsliding in the bash-sven modus again.
> You have just managed to loose any credit you had started building again
> by being reasonable in the discussions over the last few days.
> If this is the way you will behave, I _will_ get you banned from the
> debian-boot list.
Please tell me what harm i have done. both attilio and davide and eddy seem to
be in favour of 2.9+ .udebs, i did nothing but to get firm information outr of
the gtk/gnome folk, so we have strong basis for this discussion. How could
this ever be seen as hurting d-i or being a problem ?
> I will now officially start ignoring _any_ mails you send unless it
> threatens to interfere with d-i work.
Well, maybe, but i don't understand why. You are over-reacting in this.
> Gnome packagers: please ignore the message sent by Sven.
More anti-sven vendeta, thanksfully Sebastien already gave the information
that was needed.
Frans, we are discussing, this is an important issue, can you not put your
pride or whatever aside, and let everyone discuss this ? I didn't a single
time insult you or use other kind of bad behavior, and i believe my mail was
both technically good and interesting to all involved, so what is it you are
having a problem with ?