Re: graphics or text as default?

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: graphics or text as default?
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:07:46 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200605161007.46923.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 60381eeb0605160059qd944c7fn4df194b487bb0aaa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 1147679595.7496.9.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 200605160952.10790.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 60381eeb0605160059qd944c7fn4df194b487bb0aaa@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:59, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I have addressed the concerns regading this point since the
> minimeeting held some time ago[1] by proposing a solution that would
> not interfere with the present packages.

See the reply by the Gnome maintainer for why this is not an option.

Attachment: pgpNb6TsLUdTZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: graphics or text as default?
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- graphics or text as default?
  - From: Stefano Canepa <sc@linux.it>
- Re: graphics or text as default?
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: graphics or text as default?
  - From: "Eddy Petrişor" <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: powerpc daily sid_d-i CD builds working again
Next by Date: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Previous by thread: Re: graphics or text as default?
Next by thread: Re: graphics or text as default?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread