Re: partman-crypto: dm-crypt status update
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 07:48:29PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>
> >separating the partitions as 32M, 1G and the rest lead several times to the
> >error in http://www.pumuki.org/~data/di/snapshot1.png with the LVM
> >partition
> >not being defined.
> >
> >separating the partitions as 32M, 1.1G and the rest lead to a proper
> >installation.
>
> LVM not working is not unexpected :) Right now I think you need to avoid
> it. I've just started looking into it, but want to make sure that the
> basic (i.e. non-LVM functionality) is working.
The strange thing is that sometimes it uses LVM and sometimes it just creates
a crypto device accessible through dm.
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org dj:triplestereo.com
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.6.16|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
It's called a change-over. The movie goes on and nobody knows the
difference.
--Narrator (Fight club)
Reply to: