Re: libgtk+2.0-directfb question
Colin Watson wrote:
if we could simply use regular -dev libs it would be even better (and
simpler to mantain, of course).
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:36:01AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Yes, I will build a -dev .deb into the next release of the package, which
I expect will be tomorrow (I'm collapsing with sleep now due to a
5 month old baby).
I think two (not one) -dev .deb packages are needed: a (let's say)
"libgtk+2.0-directfb-udeb-dev_2.0.9-2.3_i386.deb" and a (let's say)
The -udeb-dev business was killed a while back. udebs should just be
built against regular -dev libraries; it makes the whole system
(especially library reduction) much simpler.
Maybe, not to create confusion, those old packages
should be removed from archives?