Re: libgtk+2.0-directfb question
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I will build a -dev .deb into the next release of the package, which
I expect will be tomorrow (I'm collapsing with sleep now due to a
5 month old baby).
I think two (not one) -dev .deb packages are needed: a (let's say)
"libgtk+2.0-directfb-udeb-dev_2.0.9-2.3_i386.deb" and a (let's say)
"libdirectfb-udeb-dev_0.9.22-7.1_i386.deb".
Those packages should allows us to compile gtk.so and make it run with
already existing
"libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.0.9.2-3_i386.udeb" and
"libdirectfb-0.9-22-udeb_0.9.22-7.1_i386.udeb" udebs.
I'll also set the Maintainer: as debian-boot team with myself as uploader.
Davide, Attilio, do you have pointers to how you built the working
gtk-libdirectfb libs? I'll compare those with my builds and see whats
different.
I've made such a mess of libraries on my laptop in the past months that
i cannot even tell against what actaully gtk.so compiles and runs:
someday i'll have to format my laptop to clean it.. :(
Anyway i'll try to rebuild my developement libs from scratch tomorrow using
-directfb 0.9.22 from
http://www.directfb.org/downloads/Core/DirectFB-0.9.22.tar.gz
-libgtk 2.0.9 from ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/v2.0/gtk+-2.0.9.tar.bz2
-gdk over dfb patch from
http://www.directfb.org/downloads/Libs/gdk-directfb-2003-04-07.tar.gz
then i'll send everything to you
ciao and thank you very much!
Attilio
Regards
Alastair
Frans Pop wrote:
Hi Alastair,
Thanks for the quick fixes
As you may have seen from the mountain of posts on d-boot about the
graphical installer, we now have a working build system.
Unfortunately we do not yet have a gtk.so cdebconf frontend that works
with your udeb (we currently use a tarball handcrafted by Attilio
instead).
Main reason is that neither Davide nor Attilio has been able to figure
out how to compile the frontend against it properly.
Can you offer advice (suggest a procedure)?
Would it be possible to include a libgtk+2.0-directfb library and/or
-dev package alongside the udeb that could be used to build against?
TIA,
Frans
Reply to: