On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:46:37PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> immo vero scripsit: > > b-f's as a fallback doesn't work, it's too thorougly unmaintainable. Or > > installation system needs _major_ work, easy solutions like "just fall > > back to boot-floppies" *don't* work. > It's quite interesting that you insist on b-f being so unmaintainable > when you don't seem to be involved with boot-floppies. > It's not that bad. :P It's a lot worse when you have to care about it working on non-i386. But hey, whatever. Obviously there's no value in my or Adam's experiences with trying to make a release with boot-floppies. Please, knock yourselves out. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Description: PGP signature