Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 07:57:22AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> we don't need real developing in b-f. B-f should only a fall back for
> sarge, if d-i is not ready.
I suppose it was a while ago now, but it's still a bit sad that people
are forgetting this is _exactly_ what we were saying for woody.
b-f's as a fallback doesn't work, it's too thorougly unmaintainable. Or
installation system needs _major_ work, easy solutions like "just fall
back to boot-floppies" *don't* work.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Attachment:
pgpAtOmXqC_zX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
- Re: [d-i] debconf, partitioning widget?
- From: Michael Bramer <grisu@debian.org>