[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 3.0.20 release soon



On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:48:46PM +0000, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 16:26, David Kimdon wrote:
> > I think a release would be a great idea.  I'd really like to see a few
> > releases of b-f without RC bugs before we release woody.  We
> > definately need to make sure the 3 or so remaining RC bugs are fixed
> > before releaseing 3.0.20, IMO.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> What's the situation with #132990 and the 2.4 white screens of death, do
> we have any traction on that bug yet?  Out of the four "serious" bugs
> that's the only one that causes me any real concern.  #132671 is
> obviously just a case of the sparc people getting their collective
> finger out and making a new build.  #123948/#133935 is the cdrom
> detection thing; we certainly have the technology to fix that, even if
> we don't have complete agreement from the people building custom disk
> sets about what the behaviour should be.
> 
> We're also accumulating quite a selection of powerpc-specific bugs,
> notably #138258, #131709, #132683, #134014, #135626.  None of these are
> marked RC, but the first one in particular seems like perhaps it should
> be.  Is anybody from the ppc camp looking at these?
> 
> p.

I'm pretty sure Colin has a handle on 132683. 134014 isn't being
reported by anyone else, so it may be unique to that hardware. It
doesn't occur on my newworld mac. I'll recheck 135626 and 132683 as
soon as I can get a build completed. (I need ppc versions of
cfdisk-utf8 and nano-tiny-utf8 - I'll build them myself if I get a
chance.)

-- 
*------v--------- Installing Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 --------v------*
|      <http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/installmanual>      |
|   debian-imac (potato): <http://debian-imac.sourceforge.net>   |
|            Chris Tillman        tillman@voicetrak.com          |
|                   May the Source be with you                   |
*----------------------------------------------------------------*



Reply to: