Re: Translation statistics

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Translation statistics
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 16:20:48 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011118162048.G489@alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] bReUM.A.OwD.ybB-7@murphy>
References: <[🔎] Fn9jBC.A.sdG.EH797@murphy> <[🔎] E165Svb-0008UZ-00@kc.cam.armlinux.org> <[🔎] bReUM.A.OwD.ybB-7@murphy>

On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:15:18PM +0100, Claus Hindsgaul wrote:

> Code     date           translated up-to-date strings (out of 769)
> > ca      2001-10-15  774

How can there be 774 up-to-date strings out of 769?  Are strings which are
no longer used considered up-to-date?

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

References:
- Danish inclusion on the international disk
  - From: Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>
- Re: Danish inclusion on the international disk
  - From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
- Translation statistics
  - From: Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>

Prev by Date: Re: Translation statistics
Next by Date: [again] basedebs.tgz: Supported or not?
Previous by thread: Re: Translation statistics
Next by thread: Re: Translation statistics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread