[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg_1.16.1.1~bpo60+1_i386.changes REJECTED


On Mon, 07 Nov 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2011, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Montag, den 07. November 2011:
> > > The only caveat is that the next version of dpkg-dev depends a new perl
> > > module (libfile-fcntllock-perl). We can either backport this module
> > > too or I can revert this specific change (it's a single self-contained
> > > commit):
> > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=d834b77b5d16e453b32bd36bbb5487c910e54280
> > I don't see a problem in backporting libfile-fcntllock-perl. But as mira
> > stated you have to adjust the rules and control files so that every buildd
> > build only dpkg-dev and the perl lib. Are you willing to do that?
> Yes.

I did that now. The package is in NEW. With the drop of
dpkg/dselect/libdpkg-dev the package is now "Architecture: all" and not
"Architecture: any". 

So in fact buildd won't be involved at all.

Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help
liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/

Reply to: